Exploring the Creative Possibilities of a Super Telephoto Lens
I’ve been a Nikon DSLR shooter for over 10 years now. Starting out with the small but mighty 6-megapixel D70S that did so much to crack open the hobbyist/amateur market, I’ve been lucky enough to build up my skills and photographic repertoire just as digital photography technology seemed to evolve and mature in parallel. For many, that initial leap in to the DSLR world is soon followed by the realization that the performance and creative capabilities of any camera are limited nearly as much by lens choice as by megapixels, shutter speed or dynamic range.
So, certain logical next steps in glass are often around the corner. Feeling limited by that kit lens? Time to get more reach with a telephoto or an ultra-wide zoom. Photos not as sharp as you’d like or focusing slowly in low light? Time to enter the world of primes with your first ‘nifty fifty’ 50mm f/1.8 or f/1.4, or step up to f/2.8 zooms like the 24-70mm or 70-200mm.
For most who aspire to capture wildlife or sports action with their photography, a super telephoto is often the solution. Typically, this means an effective focal length of more than 300mm. And perhaps more importantly, this usually also implies an eye-watering price tag. They can deliver stunning results, but if you have your heart set on a 400mm, 500mm or 600mm prime lens, or even a 200-400mm zoom from either Canon and Nikon, you might find yourself parting with enough cash to buy a decent used car!
Unless money is no object or you’re earning income regularly with your 500mm f/4, it’s hard for most of us to justify a purchase like that. I’m a big fan of renting equipment for individual projects or assignments when the rental costs can be recouped. Personally, I have managed survive just fine with my trusty Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 AF-D as my go-to lens this whole time, supplemented with rented or borrowed long glass when the assignment called for it.
That is, until the relatively new phenomenon of the affordable super telephoto zoom hit the market a few years ago. Tamron and Sigma were first to deliver 150-600mm lenses for surprisingly low prices, and given those prices, image quality was even more surprisingly impressive. Zoom lenses always present some level of optical compromise over equivalent focal length prime lenses, and these were no exception, but the auto-focus and sharpness performance levels were unexpected at such a budget-conscious price point.
Before long, it was clear that these two lens offerings were running essentially uncontested in a new market segment, and diverting sales from both the aging Nikon 80-400mm f/4.5-f5.6 and much more expensive Nikon 200-400mm f/4. So Nikon’s August 2015 announcement of their new 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR was not entirely a surprise in itself, but a few of its features were eye-opening. Not least of which was the price. Launched at $1399, the Nikon offering came in nearly $1,000 cheaper than most would have speculated, and perhaps more importantly, was priced even cheaper than some variants of the off-brand alternatives.
While the 200-500mm may lack the full zoom range and weather-sealing that comes with the higher-end and higher-priced versions from Sigma and Tamron, it manages to deliver a constant maximum aperture of f/5.6 at all focal lengths. This is important for both auto-focus acquisition (especially in lower light), as well as the ability of the lens to play well with teleconverters. With the addition of Nikon’s 1.4x TC-14E, the 200-500mm becomes a 280-700mm monster, while bumping maximum aperture to f/8 and crucially, still allowing autofocus on most Nikon DSLR bodies.
But before we stumble down a rabbit hole of spec-sheet analysis-paralysis, let’s stop for a moment and consider why a super telephoto lens is even worth adding to your photo toolbox in the first place. Is it all about the ability to “zoom in” on far away subjects? With today’s DSLR sensors there is no shortage of megapixels, and if the only objective is to more closely frame the subject, one can just as easily “zoom in” by cropping more tightly in Adobe Lightroom or Photoshop. After all, 6MP was enough resolution to produce some great files and prints with that original D70S camera. But cropping down to the 6MP centre of a 36.3MP D810 file created with a 50mm lens to achieve 300mm via “zoom” changes something else.
This something is field of view. Without falling into yet another rabbit hole (they’re everywhere!), field of view is the reason your wedding and portrait clients would prefer not be shot with a wide angle lens. The more narrow field of view of a telephoto or super telephoto reduces the angle at which light enters the camera, resulting in a more flat, neutral and often more pleasing rendition of people and facial features. You can zoom with your feet or crop in post, but a subject shot with a 20mm lens will appear much different than one shot with a 200mm – even when the subject fills the same space in the final image.
And because of that unique field of view, the 200-500mm can become a valuable creative tool to use in ways beyond the usual birding and shooting motorsports. Capturing a landscape at 500mm is both compositionally and aesthetically different than capturing one at 50mm or 20mm. Working toward the close-focus limit of the 200-500mm, it can also become a quasi-macro lens to bring smaller subjects into sharp focus while creating beautiful distraction-free out-of-focus backgrounds. An f-stop of f/5.6 at 20mm might be all you need to achieve front-to-back sharpness in a particular situation, but f/5.6 at 500mm will tend to throw anything outside the thin plane of focus into smooth, dream-like bokeh.
In my time with the lens so far, image quality has been spectacular, but I’ve been most impressed with its creative flexibility. Since I’m a bit of a photographic generalist, I was initially concerned that a dedicated long lens would gather dust until a particular assignment came up where I knew it would shine. On the contrary, I’ve found myself reaching for the 200-500mm in situations where a shorter lens would normally do the trick. Thanks to its relatively compact dimensions it’s possible to pack this lens in almost any camera bag that could accommodate my 80-200mm or a standard 70-200mm. And even better, thanks to its light weight and effective vibration reduction, it’s a fairly convenient lens to shoot hand-hold too.
The Nikon 200-500mm certainly delivers tremendous value and performs admirably on its typical long-lens assignments. But as a welcome surprise, compared to the longer and heavier Nikon 200-400mm f/4 or any prime super telephoto, this new lens is one you can also pack without hesitation on a hike and use whenever your imagination strikes. That alone makes for a great creative addition to your photographic tool-box.
5 thoughts on “Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6E VR Review”
Thank you for the review Matt! I’m trying to decide between this lens vs the Sigma 150-600 Sport version, with sharpness and reach being an importang decision making factor. I know I can achieve a higher reach with a TC on the Nikon but am divided about the sharpness. Then there is the weight issue with the Sigma. If I were a generalist but a birding enthusiast, which lens would you recomend?
Hi Smitha – thanks for the kind words! I haven’t shot the Sigma personally, but it seems to be a great lens as well. For me so far, the sharpness of the Nikon has been absolutely great. Very impressive. I have run into some sporadic focus issues when using the 1.4x teleconverter with it, but have yet to determine whether it’s an issue with the TC, lens, or perhaps even my D810’s focus needing some tweaking. Overall, zero hesitation about jumping in with the 200-500, and it’s served me well for birding too. On the D810 I can drop into crop mode and get a 1.5x TC effect giving 750mm at f8 and still have a nice 15mp file size.
I have D750 and 200-500. I will believe the crop mode exists on this camera, so, i will give it a try.
I’ve been doing some research on my Photo combination and stumbled on your comment about the use of the 1.4x teleconverter and wondered if you can give any advice. I have the D850 and I’m using the 200-500mm with a 1.4x TC-14-111. I think I’m experiencing some autofocus issues and wondered if you had heard of any similar problems? I know I’m only going to get f8 with this combo but appear to have problems locking the focus in, on birds in flight at distance and inconsistent noise through auto ISO use. I would appreciate any comment you could make.
Wow thank you so much for the review I have been looking for on this lens. I have been considering this lens for over a year and with it being $200 off now was just about to pull the trigger. Two years ago I went from a D7000 where I shot 90% of the time with an 18-200 Nikon lens to a D500 with the 16-80 kit lens. I love everything about this combination and my pictures are great but I miss being able to get the background as blurred out as I would like to. I have also considered the Tamron 18-400 because I kept telling myself that all anyone uses this lens for is wildlife and some sports. But I don’t really need the wide end of the Tamron because I’m sure my current lens would blow it away. Your review was so useful to me as you covered so many other uses for it and the fact that you use it often. I believe I am ready to buy it now. Thanks so much.