I’ve just returned from a two-week wildlife photography expedition in the Chilcotin Mountains of British Columbia, where I was photographing grizzly bears from a kayak. Since the memories are fresh in my mind, it is the perfect time to craft a list of essential items for wildlife photographers.
Binoculars or a Monocular
Wildlife photography is often a waiting game and you might spend hours scanning the horizon for your intended subject. It’s simply not practical or comfortable to do this with your camera and lens – a pair of binoculars or a monocular is an absolutely essential accessory for a wildlife photographer. A monocular can be a great choice when you have to hike to your location because they are smaller, lighter and fit easily onto your belt. If you are shooting from your car or a safari vehicle, then a pair of binoculars will likely be a better choice. In fact, for many people, there’s good reason to have access to both options in your gear closet but I’ll leave that decision up to you.
The most popular magnifications are 8X and 10X. 10X devices are physically larger but in most cases, I don’t find them to be prohibitive. There is probably some math that you could do to work out the 35mm equivalent of a 10X pair of binoculars but all you really need to know is that it’s a lot! A 10X set of binoculars is going to show you a far closer view than your super-telephoto lens does, and that’s the important thing.
When you’re looking at specifications you’ll see binoculars are always represented by two numbers. For example; 10X42 or 8X32. The first number is of course the magnification, while the second number is the size of the objective lens in millimetres. A larger lens lets more light in and offers a brighter view through the eyepieces, at the expense of added weight of course. Juggling these two numbers gives rise to a huge variety of different size options. Another thing that you’ll likely want to take notice of is the waterproofing. Since we can’t really guarantee what the weather will be like, I would always opt for a fully waterproof setup. In most cases, this actually adds very little cost to the equation.
When you start looking at the options that are out there you’ll also see a huge variation in pricing, even when comparing binoculars with seemingly similar specifications. Price is somewhat determined by the quality of the optics, and also the size of the device. It’s possible to get very small 10X devices, but the smaller you make a 10X device, the more expensive it becomes to maintain good optical quality in a miniature form factor. It’s a definite balancing act so you need to decide what’s most important to you between price, magnification, physical size and optical quality.
- Zeiss Victory SF 32 – The long-awaited smaller brother to the Victory SF 42.
- Zeiss SFL 40 – A lighter-weight option, available in 8x or 10x magnification.
- Zeiss SFL 30 – Coming in early 2023, even smaller than the SFL 40, available in 8x and 10x.
- Swarovski NL Pure 12×42 – The new gold standard in binocular optical quality.
- Nikon Monarch HG – High-end optics at a lower price than might be expected – my personal choice.
- Bushnell 10x42mm Legend Ultra HD Binoculars – Extremely popular and multi award-winning
- Leica Ultravid 10x25mm Compact Binoculars – Incredibly compact and optically excellent but at Leica prices of course
- Zeiss Terra ED Pocket Binoculars – Portable and rugged for a good price.
- Bushnell 9×32 Monocular – Cheap, waterproof, and pocket-sized. Less than $50, so this is a great gift idea!
- Vortex Solo 10×25 Waterproof Monocular – Also available in 8x magnification version or with a 36mm lens.
The majority of good wildlife photography opportunities will be early in the morning or late in the evening when the light is less harsh. This almost certainly means that you’ll spend some time in the darkness, whether it be before or after your photography session. I personally like to carry both a headlamp and a flashlight with me. The headlamp is perfect when you need two hands to rummage in a camera bag, and they also do a great job of illuminating your immediate surroundings when you are walking in the dark.
A small, powerful LED torch can be great as well though, as this allows you to light up distant objects and it can also be a handy light painting tool! I use the Petzl Swift RL. You can recharge it via USB and it also has a red LED mode which is great for illuminating closer objects, like your camera, but without affecting your night vision. For photographers, I would consider that to be a must-have feature, and you’ll also find it in the cheaper Petzl Bindi rechargeable headlamp, which is like the baby brother to the Swift RL. I try to keep as many of my accessories as possible chargeable via USB so that I can top them up with my Goal Zero Venture 30 battery pack.
For LED flashlights I rely on a couple of slightly different models from Fenix. These kinds of accessories don’t have to break the bank, but they can make a huge difference to the success of your photo mission!
A Telephoto Lens
There’s really no escaping the fact that you’re going to need a relatively long lens to achieve the kind of wildlife photos you’ll likely be proud of. At a bare minimum, I would suggest having something in the 400mm equivalent range. I say equivalent because the crop factor of APS-C sensor cameras like the Canon 90D or Nikon Z50 will provide you an angle of view that’s equivalent to a longer focal length lens in 35mm terms. For example, a 300mm lens on a 1.6x crop Canon camera has an equivalent angle of view to 480mm on a full-frame camera.
The Canon 100-400 IS II is a popular option for enthusiasts, as is the Nikon 200-500, the Nikon 500mm PF, the Fuji 100-400 and the Sony 200-600. Tamron also has an excellent 150-600mm lens which comes in at an astonishingly cheap price for a lens that will take you all the way to 600mm. I’ve actually tested this lens myself whilst shooting grizzly bears and was impressed by its sharpness.
Sigma have also released two variations on a 150-600mm lens, following the unmitigated success of Tamron’s lens with wildlife photography enthusiasts. The cheaper of Sigma’s two models takes direct aim at the Tamron equivalent, while the higher-end version is built to withstand the rigours of professional usage.
For Nikon users, Matt has written both a review of the Nikon 200-500mm and also a separate piece about using the 200-500 with the Nikon D500 – possibly Nikon’s best budget wildlife photography setup. The recent launch of the new Nikkor 500mm f/5.6 PF lens is also an intriguing addition to the plethora of telephoto choices on the market these days. Although about twice the price of the Nikkor 200-500, the 500mm PF is smaller, lighter, faster and much sharper. Just look how it compares in size to the 500mm f/4! I expect this to be a huge hit for Nikon in the coming years, and at 500mm it’s a great choice for both full-frame and APS-C users.
Sony user must undoubtedly consider the incredibly good value Sony 200-600mm G lens, which one the very first Sony lens I purchased myself when I moved to a Sony mirrorless system. The lens is sharp throughout the range and even works well with the Sony 1.4x extender to give you a hand-holdable 840mm lens (see above wild bison image). As far as I’m concerned, if you’re a Sony user, because of the stunning value of the native 200-600mm lens there is absolutely no point in considering a third-party option in this range. The AF speed of acquisition and tracking accuracy is better with native Sony lenses, and the price is right. Sony users probably have the easiest choice!
Of course, there are always the more expensive Canon, Sony and Nikon super-telephoto lenses as well. Canon’s 200-400 f/4 L IS 1.4ext (a lens that I owned myself for many years) is widely regarded as the king of wildlife lenses at the current moment, but the price of this lens is enough to cause most people to spit out their coffee. The question that often arises then, is should you bother to own a cheaper long lens option like the Sigma’s or the Tamron, or should you simply spend that money on renting the more expensive options when you need them? This is a great question!
I’ll tell you right now that there is a discernible difference in image quality between these two brackets of lenses if you look closely. But the biggest difference is that the apertures on the larger primes and zooms from Canon, Sony and Nikon are larger and constant. Having access to f/4 on something like a Sony 600mm f/4 GM, over f/6.3 on something like the Tamron makes a huge difference when you are shooting in low light. You can go on shooting keepers much longer with the prime lens and you’ll also be shooting at a lower ISO. On paper, it looks like a small difference, but having just come off the back of a trip where I shot the Tamron 150-600 alongside the Canon 200-400 f/4, I can tell you that in the field, in practice, it makes a massive difference.
So what does this mean? Well for me it means that my advice for people taking that once in a lifetime safari trip is to rent one of the big guns from someone like Lensrentals, and not bother with these cheaper variable aperture zoom lenses. If on the other hand, you are shooting wildlife more regularly, and not just on one-off safaris, then definitely consider the Tamron and Sigma options as well as the native Nikon, Sony or Canon ones.
The variable aperture telephoto zooms also occupy a great space alongside the super-telephoto lenses if you have a second camera body. For example, if you have a rented 600mm on your primary camera, it’s nice to have a 100-400 on a second body right next to you so that you can grab some wider scenic shots, or react quickly if an animal decides to investigate your safari vehicle at a closer distance.
A Bean Bag
Bean bags are an excellent way to support your camera and lens combination where a tripod just isn’t practical. They are often used in safari vehicles, but of course, they work just as well in your own vehicle! LensCoat LensSacks are the perfect answer and they come in a couple of different sizes. Their design means they rest easily over a car door, or provide a perfect lens cradle when being used on the ground for low angle shooting. The idea is that you empty the sacks for travel, then fill them up with whatever you can find when you get to your destination. Buckwheat hulls work well for bean bag fill, or you can simply use rice in a pinch.
I keep one of these in the back of my car at all times – you just never know when you’ll come across something interesting to shoot. As with many of the items on this list, they are inexpensive and don’t take up a lot of room, yet have the ability to really enhance your wildlife photography experiences.
The LensSack has a threaded stud on the top so you can attach a clamp or ball head. I like to use the RRS Panning Clamp. That way I have a perfectly smooth panning motion with a heavy setup, but it’s much less bulky to set up than using a full gimbal in my car.
Hand holding longer lenses can work for birds in flight, but that’s about it. Many of the best wildlife photography opportunities happen early in the morning or late in the evening when light levels force you to use a very slow shutter speed. Combine this with the magnified shaking effect of longer focal lengths and a tripod is really an essential item.
I regularly find myself shooting well under 1/200 second with focal lengths in the 400-600mm range. Even a 5-stop image stabilizer isn’t going to help you get consistent results in that area without a tripod. The other reason for getting a tripod is simply to prevent fatigue. On a day of shooting, many hours can be spent watching and waiting. Save your energy and use a tripod to have your gear ready and waiting right in front of you.
Choosing a tripod could be the subject of a very very long post on its own, but I’ll offer a few tips here and tell you about some of my favourite options. The two biggest mistakes I think people make when choosing a tripod are to buy one that’s too cheap and buy one that’s too short. I’ve made both these mistakes myself! Pay close attention to the height of the tripod when it’s fully extended.
The trap most people fall into is getting one that appears to correctly put their camera at eye level. The problem with this is that it assumes flat ground! When have you ever found flat ground outside? In reality, you’ll want to have the ability to have one downhill leg extend longer and still have the camera at eye level. I’m not a tall guy (5’10”) but I still find that the Really Right Stuff TVC-24L is a great tripod for me and I regularly rejoice at the height I can extend it to. I previously had a TVC-33S but the constant hunching over to my camera quickly drove me nuts so I had to switch it for something taller.
Related Reading: The Ultimate Guide to Really Right Stuff Tripods
The other mistake I’ve made is buying a cheap tripod and then constantly having to deal with problems and breakages. In the beginning, it’s all too easy to think a tripod is a place you can save money. It’s perfectly possible to get good photos using a cheap tripod, right up to the point at which it breaks, and then you’re screwed! Please, please do not buy the cheapest tripod that will “do the job”. You’ll regret it. Trust me!
In the end, you’ll only have to replace it and then you might as well have just started with a good one in the first place. A well maintained, high-quality tripod will last ten years or more. Yes my tripod is a pricey choice, and I’m not saying you have to pay RRS prices, but I take great satisfaction in the sturdiness of it and knowing that it’s going to be with me for many adventures to comes.
If funds can’t stretch to RRS pricing then I’d take a look at Induro’s carbon tripods and the ever-present Manfrotto 055. I have a carbon Induro monopod that I’ve been using for 10 years now and I love that thing. Is carbon worth the extra cost? I believe it is. You get superior vibration dampening, considerable weight savings and vastly improved strength. On a long day where you’re already carrying a heavy lens and camera setup, you’ll be thankful for the weight saving. Gitzo tripods, particularly the 2-series and 3-series legs, are also worth a good look. They are about 80% of the price of RRS tripods, though their capacity/weight ratio isn’t quite as good.
A Gimbal Head
A gimbal head is a device that sits on top of your tripod and perfectly balances your camera and lens combination, allowing you to pan and tilt it in any direction with almost zero effort. For wildlife photography with any lens of 400mm or more, I would consider this an essential item. Ball heads are designed to be positioned and then locked for the photo, but when shooting wildlife you are often following your subject and a gimbal makes this much easier.
In the past, Wimberley made the only gimbals worth considering, but today there are actually a few excellent options out there. My personal primary choice is the ProMediaGear Katana Junior because I believe the stability to weight ratio is unmatched in other options on the market. This gimbal weighs just 2.4lbs but can easily support the largest photo gear on the market. For more info, read my ProMediaGear Katana Junior gimbal review.
The Wimberley WH-200 is another great option and it’s definitely the one I’ve seen on fellow photographer’s tripods the most. It’s a little cheaper than the RRS option, but it’s buttery smooth and equally well built. It also features a bottom mount cradle which is an additional $100 option on the Really Right Stuff PG-02 Mk2. I personally don’t mind a side-mount and I happily use it with my heavy beast of a Canon 200-400 f/4, but I know it perplexes some folks when used with heavier lenses.
One of the latest additions to the gimbal market is the Gitzo Fluid Gimbal Head, which is actually priced very attractively at $499. Unlike most other gimbals which rely on bearings, the Gitzo gimbal is a fluid head, however, this head has some quirks so I would recommend reading my Gitzo Fluid Gimbal review before committing to this particular head.
For smaller primes like a 300mm, or zooms such as the Sony 200-600mm or Tamron 150-600mm, the Fotopro Eagle E-6H would also be an excellent option. Looking for more options for different budgets? Check out my guide to the best gimbal heads on the market this year.
If you are an avid monopod user for times when you need to travel light, you must not overlook the Wimberley MonoGimbal. In fact for monopod-touting wildlife shooters, I would consider this relative cheap accessory a “must-have” item. Essentially it gives you that gimbal feel and range of motion, but on a monopod! You can read my full Wimberley MonoGimbal review here.
A Camera Bag For Long Lenses
You’re going to need a rugged camera bag that’s capable of carrying large telephoto lenses. Shoulder bags and slings don’t offer enough size and support, so a good backpack is what I would recommend. The following bags are my current recommendations for those carrying big super telephoto lenses:
- Gura Gear Kiboko 2.0
- Think Tank Photo FirstLight 40L
- MindShift Backlight Elite 45L
- Think Tank Photo Airport Advantage XT Roller
- Shimoda Action X70
- Lenscoat Xpandable
Let’s take a closer look at why I think these are the best options.
Gura Gear Kiboko 2.0
The current king of long lens backpacks is the Gura Gear Kiboko 2.0, available in four sizes: 16L, 22L, 30L, and 30L+. The two-sided design of these bags allows you to carry two cameras with long lenses attached and ready to go. The largest Kiboko backpacks will carry up to a 600mm f/4 or 800mm f/5.6 lens. For a detailed look at all four sizes of this bag, see my Gura Gear Kiboko review.
Gura Gear has offered Shutter Muse readers a 10% discount on anything purchased in their online store. Just use the discount code SHUTTERMUSE10 after clicking here to access their store.
Think Tank Photo FirstLight 40L
If you need more comfort for hiking, I recommend the MindShift Gear FirstLight 40L (read my MindShift FirstLight review here). The 40L FirstLight pack holds a similar payload to the Gura Gear Kiboko 30L, but it has a more traditional opening system and a much beefier harness that includes adjustable torso length. This pack will also carry those super-telephoto lenses like a champ and includes a special padded collar for securing them.
MindShift BackLight Elite 45L
Another great option is the top-of-the-line MindShift Backlight Elite 45L. This would suit someone looking to carry one long lens with a selection of other lenses and outdoor gear. It’s made from excellent materials and has more features than any other camera bag I have ever reviewed. You can read the Backlight Elite 45L review here for more details.
Think Tank Rollers
If you need a simple case for your long lens, check out the Think Tank Glass Limo. If you need a rolling camera bag specifically for airline travel with your long lenses, check out the entire Think Tank roller range, but pay specific attention to their ultralight Airport Advantage XT. If you’re carrying a big heavy lens, it’s nice to pair it with a lightweight bag when some airlines are enforcing 7KG weight limits for carry-on bags.
US Customers get a free gift when they spend over $50 in the Think Tank/MindShift online store after clicking this link. For more details, or if you have any issues, see this post.
Shimoda Action X70
The Action X70 is the largest of Shimoda’s camera backpacks. Choose this bag if you need to carry a ton of additional gear alongside your telephoto lens. If I want to carry a tent and a sleeping bag alongside a 600mm lens, this is the bag I pull from my closet. It starts with a 70L volume, but the roll-top design takes that even further if you need it.
Shimoda Designs has offered Shutter Muse readers a 10% discount on anything purchased in their online store. Simply use the discount code ShutterMuse10 after clicking here to access the store.
LensCoat Xpandable Bag
The LensCoat Xpandable bag is a unique long lens carrying solution. The bag expands to hold telephoto lenses when the hood is attached, and when you aren’t using it, the whole thing collapses flat for storage or travel. It’s a great bag to use in a safari vehicle or a boat. Please read my full review of the LensCoat Xpandable bag for more details.
A Long Lens Rain Cover
When you consider the cost of your lens, a waterproof cover for it should be a no-brainer. Since it is impossible to make any guarantees on the weather, it’s an inevitability that at some point you’ll be caught in the rain while trying to find, or waiting for your chosen subject. There actually aren’t a whole lot of options out there for quality long lens covers, but the Think Tank Hydrophobia 300-600 V3 is the best-known one for super-telephoto lenses, and the Hydrophobia 70-200 V3 is the best one for telephoto zooms such as a 70-200mm, 100-400mm or 80-400mm. As the name of the 300-600 suggests, it’s good for lenses sized from 300mm f/2.8 up to 600mm f/4, but it’ll also work with an 800mm f/5.6 or longer tele-zooms such as a Tamron 150-600mm, Nikon 200-500mm or Sigma 60-600mm.
Think Tank’s products are universally well made and I’ve owned a Hydrophobia for my long lenses for over a decade as they have worked through various iterations and improvements to get to this V3 version. In fact, they have even reduced the price of this cover with the latest V3 version, which makes it an even better purchase than before.
The cover surrounds the lens and camera body entirely, and the LCD screen and controls can be viewed through the clear back panel, whilst lens controls have their own clear top panel. It also comes with a front element cover which is tethered to the main cover, and useful when you’re waiting for long periods or moving around with the lens on your shoulder.
Note that the tripod opening for the cover is on the bottom. For those using side-mount gimbals like the Sidekick from Wimberley, or the Really Right Stuff gimbal pictured earlier with my Canon 200-400, you’ll have to use the armhole on the left-hand side to pass the lens foot through. Not a big deal, it works just fine and this is how I use my cover all the time.
The other thing that you need to be aware of with these covers is that they require a camera-specific eyepiece to be purchased separately. These used to be much more expensive, but Think Tank sensibly halved the price of them when they launched the V3 versions of these covers. The dedicated eyepiece can be seen in the photo above, and it’s necessary so that the cover can form a perfect watertight seal. When the eyepiece is not in use, there’s a storage pocket for it on the cover.
The second option is the Aquatech Sport Shield which is available in four different sizes. Just like the Think Tank cover, these also need a dedicated eyepiece and I actually prefer the Aquatech eyepieces. The Sports Shields only have an armhole on the right-hand side, though, which some might deem to be a disadvantage, particularly if you are trying to operate the zoom ring on a long lens like the Canon 200-400, or if you are wanting to keep your hands warm and dry. Having said that, the lack of a second armhole means the Aquatech covers are a little less bulky when packed. It’s a pretty close run race between these two options but if you pressed me, I’d pick the Think Tank Hydrophobia because they are now quite a bit cheaper with the recent price reductions, and they also come with a front cover for your lens.
US Customers get a free gift when they spend over $50 in the Think Tank/MindShift online store after clicking this link. For more details, or if you have any issues, see this post.
Teleconverters, sometimes called extenders, are a great way to extend the reach of your long lens when photographing smaller animals, or ones that you simply can’t get close to. As I wrote in a previous article, extenders are a vital part of my wildlife photography kit.
Unfortunately, there’s a lot of misinformation out there on the internet when it comes to extenders, much of which is based on old technology and incorrect technique. The fact is that extenders from the major brands are all very good when used properly with compatible lenses. They do affect AF speed, contrast and sharpness, but there are ways to mitigate that if you really understand the limitations. I’ve previously written what I believe to be the most in-depth guide to extenders on the internet: The Ultimate Guide to Extenders or Teleconverters. In that free guide you’ll learn everything there is to know about extenders, and I share a ton more photos that were created by using them.
What I really want to do is to reassure people that it is perfectly possible to get stellar images when using an extender. Many of my favourite images have been shot with extenders, and that even includes 2x extenders, which some people would have you believe are garbage! Take this shot of the bear eating barnacles, for example. This was taken with a Canon 2x extender and using proper techniques it’s tack sharp!
Whilst I would never buy a lens with the sole intention of using it continuously with an extender on it, they can be an incredibly handy tool to have in your back pocket for occasional extra reach and compositional variation.
Replacement Telephoto Lens Cap
The lens caps that come as standard with super telephoto lenses are usually bulky and fiddly to deal with in the field. You can solve this problem by buying a replacement lens cap from Zemlin Photo. These lens caps are made from fiberglass-reinforced plastic and deliver several benefits compared to standard super tele caps.
Firstly, they are much quicker to attach and detach in the field. Secondly, they are usually lighter than the standard caps and take up much less room in your backpack. Finally, unlike the standard cap that came with the lens, you can slip it into your pocket while you’re shooting. I love these, and Zemlin Photo makes them for almost every super-telephoto lens from Canon, Sony, Nikon, Sigma, Fujifilm, and Olympus. Read the review for more details.
Shorter Travel and Vehicle Friendly Lens Hoods
Shorter Travel and Vehicle Friendly Lens Hoods
As well as their excellent super-telephoto lens caps, Zemlin Photo also manufactures replacement lens hoods for super-telephoto lenses. This includes all large telephoto lenses from Canon, Nikon, Sony, and a few other manufacturers. For each lens, hoods are available in multiple lengths. You can choose to have one the same size as the original lens hood, or you can choose to go shorter. Shorter hoods are lighter and consume less room in your bag while traveling. They are also far easier to handle in the confines of a vehicle. I love the short hood I got for my Nikon 800mm lens!
As a bonus, these hoods start at around $150, compared to the $500-$1000 prices charged for original hoods. This makes it a much more acceptable risk to throw the hood in your checked luggage, saving you even more weight and space in your carry-on. Read the review for more details.
A Ground Pod
Getting low to the ground almost always improves wildlife photos. It creates a more intimate-feeling image and creates greater separation between your subject and the background. While most tripods will allow you to get down to a very low angle, they are difficult to maneuver in this position. The Skimmer ground pod from Naturescapes is designed to easily slide across dirt and sand while still maintaining a solid shooting platform.
If you’re belly-crawling across the ground, the Skimmer will make it much easier to adjust your angle and slowly creep slower toward your subject. In my review of the Skimmer, I extensively discuss the best heads to use with a ground pod. Gimbals, ball heads, and 2-way tilt heads have pros and cons in that situation.
55 thoughts on “9 Essential Pieces Of Wildlife Photography Gear”
Great article..fan of your work from Nepal.. I am a newbie with a dream to become a great wildlife photographer but it seems like I can never afford the gears..LOL…now I think I should concentrate on occasional nature and macro shooting…
use full list. but camera is a esstential one for the list.why its not inculded
I think anyone that goes to take photos will know to bring a camera. This list is for all the other things that I have discovered useful from my experience.
All of the items you’ve listed are USEFUL, but only two of them are ESSENTIAL: a camera, and a lens.
Thanks! Well if the items were truly essential to taking a picture then the list would, of course, just be a camera and a lens. But these items can be considered essential in a grander scheme. Think of it like a first aid kit. If I was going camping for a few days, I would consider a first aid kit an essential item to pack. No, I might not use the first aid kit, nor do I need it to begin the process of actually hiking to my camp destination, but it’d sure be a bad move to go on the trip without one. The items on this list, after a decade+ of photography travel, can be considered in a similar way. When I pack, they always come with me and every trip, a considerable proportion of them play important roles in allowing me to do the job.
Great informational review. I have Tamron 70-200mm F2.8 Di Vc Usd lens with Tamron SP AF 1.4x Teleconverter for my Canon 70D camera. This gives me a total focal length of 448mm, considering the 1.6 crop factor on my camera. I have a new found love for Bird Photography. Are my equipment enough for this? I do not have a tripod and is currently looking for something around $ 200. Do you know any heavy tripod for this amount, I do not want carbon fiber, any heavy aluminum tripod will do. Please revert.
A fan of you from Sri Lanka.
448mm should be enough for some birds but you might have to find locations where they are used to humans as you will need to get very close to them, especially if they are small birds. 448mm is definitely enough to get nice shots of larger predatory birds like eagles if you can position yourself in the right place. Honestly, I do not think that you need to rush to buy a tripod, though. That setup is not very big and you wouldn’t need a gimbal to use it. You would be better to buy a simple monopod I think. For bird photography we do not need a tripod to stabilize the shot because actually you’ll always have enough shutter speed for this not to be a problem. A tripod is only seen with bird photographers because it’s nice to rest the lens on it while you wait, and to have the lens in a good position ready for action. Since a 70-200 is a smaller lens and easy to move quickly, I think a monopod would be fine for you.
Hi Dan. I use a 100-400mm on a Canon 700D body and like bird photography. There have been times where I had a need for extra reach. Would you recommend a 500mm f4, 300mm f2.8 with a 2X TC or do I get a 1.4X TC and use it with the 100-400mm ?
I am an occasional shooter. Say one trip a month to a some nearby sanctuaries and do this as a hobby.
Hey! I think I am right in saying that the 700D will not autofocus with the 100-400 and a 1.4x extender, so that makes it pretty useless for you purpose. Honestly, I would suggest looking at the Tamron 150-600. It provides incredible value for the hobbyist shooter.
It seems that GURA GEAR has been taken over and the Sabi Sack is no longer available.
Any ideas on a comparable replacement?
Also I’m bound to be shooting where sand is abundantly available for the Sabi Sack (whatever that may be). Is that a terrible idea?
That does appear to be the case! Thanks for pointing it out. I have ordered a couple of other similar products to test them out. Hopefully I can find a new one to recommend. Will update this post when I know the answer 🙂
FYI – This is the one I have initially ordered to test as a possible replacement. Once tested, I will update this page if it is successful. I like that it has a removable plate in it. That can be handy in some situations. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1184458-REG/lenscoat_lclspjdc_lenssack_pro_jr.html/BI/7152/KBID/7700
Love the articles on the site. Long time reader.
Had a question about your side mount gimbal. My current longest lens is the Canon 500L II. If space wasn’t an issue, do you prefer the cradle or the side mount?
I’ve been going back and forth between the different options from wimberley and rrs. Initially, was gonna go with the Sidekick but don’t want to put that stress on my BH-55 ball head so might go full on gimbal, with rrs being the front runner because of the ability to do multi row panos in the future. But now you mentioned the side mount rrs option, which I don’t see many people online talk about so wondering if it’s a viable alternative to the full rrs gimbal with the cradle.
Any information or insight would be appreciated. Thanks!
Hi Ming! Sorry it took me a while to reply. Somehow I missed this comment when it came in. I absolutely LOVE the RRS side mount version. It’s way more stable feeling the a sidekick. With my 200-400 f/4, it’s rock solid. I think that’s slightly heavier than your 500mm. I honestly can’t think of a reason to use the cradle option. I think most people choose it because they think the side mount one looks a bit odd and potentially dangerous for the lens, but there’s really nothing wrong with it at all. I have been using it for years. It balances just the same as the cradle version. Nothing has ever tempted me to try the cradle.
Great info! thank you so much. I’m curious about the idea of renting a telephoto lens… how does one go about that?
It’s actually pretty simple if you stick to using the big, well established companies such as lensrentals.com. You select the lens, they ship it to you and include all the return shipping documents too, so it’s really easy to send it back when you’re done.
I’ve had some good results with the low end Canon SX60-HS. I put some images on a web page, take a look here: http://sportsflashtech.com/wildlife-shooting/canon-hs60sx.html
Thank you so much for the wonderful article.
You said you were using using two stacked 1.4x extenders for the photo of the eagle. Do you mean you use 2 1.4X TCs on the same lens? If so, can I stack one 1.4x and one 2X? Thank you
Hey! Here’s an article I have written on stacking extenders 🙂 http://shuttermuse.com/how-to-stack-canon-extenders-teleconverters/
Thanks a lot for your article! I’m at the point to buy a new Canon and a few new lenses. Now I have the problem, that I don’t know if the 1Dx Mk II oder the 5D Mk IV together with the 7D Mk II. Lenses I have the EF 70-200mm f/2.8, EF 100mm 2.8 and think about to buy the 300mm f4 or the 100-400mm 4.5-5.6. I read so much in the last few days that I am really confused… perhaps you can help me a little bit?
If you want to do wildlife then a 300m or even a 100-400mm isn’t going to be long enough in many situations on a full frame camera. You are better to buy the 5D and the 7D and then you have the added reach of the 7D when you need it. This is the setup I use.
Hi Dan, thanks for the great article. Not sure if this is the best place to ask but I plan on doing some bird photography this spring. I am just wondering what the best type of head would suit this type of photography. Some initial research has said ball heads but would appreciate your opinion! Thanks in advance!
Actually I think for birds, a gimbal head is MUCH better. A gimbal is by the best thing for tracking moving objects. A ballhead is really designed to be locked down for static usage, but a gimbal can help you track a flying bird AND be locked down for a static bird.
Great article, appreciate the detailed thoughts (nice grizzly pic too). Considering options, and like the 100-400 zoom, plus rent a super-zoom strategy makes lots of sense for a ‘wanna-be but never gets enough time’ wildlife photographer.
Thanks! Yeah I really to think that’s a good way to go. Put that money into travel trips and rent from Lensrentals (or similar).
Dear Dan, Thank you for this very informative article. I am a hobbyist bird photographer. I use Nikon D5200, with Tamron 150-600 and Kenko 1.4x and 2x TCs, is this a good setup or I need to upgrade my body as I dont get sharp images.I get may be 1 good shot out of 100 shots on an average,Is it bad technique or the body, With 1.4 TC the AF works OK, but with 2x I have to manual focus. Please advise.
I would not recommend using the 2x extend on that lens at all. Just forget about it, you’ll get a better result by using the 1.4x, or no extender at all and then simply cropping the image to “zoom” digitally. The Tamron 150-600 is an excellent lens though, and so it’s likely that it is more down to your technique that you are not getting many keepers. Most people’s major mistake is not using some kind solid support like a tripod, and then also making sure you have a fast enough shutter speed.
I would recommend that you go and perform some testing. Set up an object and photograph it from a distance, then go and take a close look at these photos on a computer. If the object is not moving, you should have no problem getting a sharp photo.
I have been tasked with getting a gift for my boss who is a avid wildlife photographer.
He has all the above mentioned items, and then some.
He is a older gentleman , and I`m at a loss at what to get.
Can you advise me?
Hey Kurt! Happy to try and help – I like a challenge. How about a portable photography blind? I would recommend the Tragopan ones found here: https://amzn.to/2NkQ3KN
I just discovered your website and wanted to say thank you for all the hard work that went into making a great site for photographers!
Super well balanced and helpful,hope its paying off for you as it provides great insights for every photographer.
on a personal note, i started out in digital photography with Canon super zooms…1.2 mg pixel and went the gambit from rebel xt to Nikon 7000 then to nikon D4 and now just sticking with all Olympus mirrorless.
So for me now its the 300mm f4 with tc14… i just luv the sharpness of this lens. it gives me 2x crop factor on Olympus omd em1 mk2 body
which is 600mm and 840mm reach. I mostly shoot handheld and continuous focus 8 frames sec. i try not to spray and pray at all. I use electronic shutter as well. the only weak link in the system is me, the lens camera combo is amazing for birds and wildlife, and totally water proof. I live up in Prince Rupert which is fairly wet!
heres a link to my website with a sample bald eagle shot with that lens camera combo.
cheers Dan and i will be frequenting your site from now on, all the best,
Hey Evan! Thanks for the kind comments and for taking the time to share your setup. Love the eagle shot! I haven’t made it up to Prince Rupert yet but one day I hope to 🙂
Overseas military on tight budget. Looking for pano-gimbal head and tripod that will work with a Nikon 3400 and a Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR Lens, What are your suggestions? I love the really right stuff pano head you have but can’t justify the cost as an intermediate/travel photographer.
Hey Jennifer, for a good budget option you should have a look at this one from Benro, it’s about half the price of the RRS one and amazingly it’s made of carbon so it’s light too! https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1429472-REG/benro_gh5c_carbon_fiber_gimbal.html/BI/7152/KBID/7700/KWID/DFF/DFF/d50
sir are you a wildlife photographer
if you are a then please send some photos so that i can share photos to my friends sir please
Sometimes I am. You can find many of my wildlife photos on this website 🙂
I have been tasked with getting a gift for my boss who is an avid wildlife photographer. Looking for pano-gimbal head and tripod that will work with a Nikon 3400 and a Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR Lens, What are your suggestions? I love the really right stuff pano head you have but can’t justify the cost as an intermediate/travel photographer.
I would try this one then, from Benro. Good value!: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1157906-REG/benro_gh2_gimbal_head_with.html/BI/7152/KBID/7700/DFF/d10-v21-t1-x644778/SID/DFF
Hi Dan – great and informative article. Do you think a M43 camera is suitable for wildlife photography, particularly in low light conditions? I have the Olympus E-M1 II which I bought for more general outdoor use but over time have become more interested in wildlife photography specifically. The more I read the more I think I would be better off with a full frame or least a larger crop sensor (thinking D850 or D500). Would be very interested in your thoughts. Thanks!
Hi Dan, just discovered this article. Was a great read and gave me great advice. Especially since Im a newbie to the wildlife game. Question: is there any use for filters shooting wildlife? Or should i just use a hood? If you do use filters what type do you use? Thanks again.
That sounds like a great topic for a post. The only two I would ever use would be a polarizer if the animal was wet, or a neutral density filter if the animal was being very still close to water, and I wanted to create a special effect of adding movement to the water. Off the top of my head, that’s about it. And to be honest, neither of those situations is that common. Even when an animal is wet, you have to balance the benefits of the filter against the loss of light that is caused by a polarizer. If the light level is already low, it’s often not worth it.
This might be a helpful post: https://shuttermuse.com/4-reasons-you-need-a-polarizing-filter/
Stay tuned for a post on this topic, though. Excellent idea!
Yes, this is a Good one
It’s hard to say
Bonsoir Dan, français, je découvre ton site et tes points de vue judicieux. Bravo! Pour ma part en photo animalière j’utilise un Nikon D850 et un 500 PF F/5,6. J’adore ce matos qui répond à presque tous mes scenarii mais je m’interroge encore sur l’opportunité d’un prolongateur x1.4…
C’est une question difficile. Je n’ai pas utilisé cet objectif avec un prolongateur, je ne peux donc pas donner de réponse précise. Je pense que vous trouverez que la qualité d’image serait bonne, mais la vitesse de mise au point automatique en souffrirait au point que vous ne voudriez peut-être pas l’utiliser avec des sujets en mouvement rapide.
I agree with you
I agree with you
Thanks Dan. Excellent info as always.
It’s worth noting that the Tamron 150-600 appears in G1 and G2. The latter is the later and better option.
That’s true! Thanks for reminding me. It was the G1 I tested for DP Review early in its life before the G2 came out.
Thanks for the info Dan! I always wished to indulge in wildlife photography but the equipments (and the time to travel) do not seem to be affordable. I now have shifted my interest in Macro types. I am thinking of buying a macro lens, but I am confused about the VR/VC (stabilization) option. Is that necessary in Macro shoots. I own a Nikon D5600.
It’s not necessary as long as you plan to use a tripod. Some people find it helpful for handheld macro work, but you will always get the best results with a tripod.
I agree, a very useful thought
In any event, when a creature is wet, you need to adjust the advantages of the channel against the deficiency of light that is brought about by a polarizer.
Think Tank reasonably divided the cost of them when they dispatched the V3 renditions of these covers.