Yesterday I was photographing this moose in the Yukon, using my monopod, and that’s when it struck me that this would be a good tutorial topic.

Wildlife photography almost always requires a telephoto lens and this in turn often necessitates the use of some sort of support for your camera. While many people can hand hold their long lenses for brief periods of time, and indeed there are some times that this is beneficial, the fact is that eventually you will run out of light in the day and your shutter speed will fall past a hand-holdable limit. With so much wildlife activity happening at the low light extremities of the day, an understanding of the best time to use support options such as a monopod or a tripod is important.

In this post I’m going to specifically concentrate on monopods for wildlife photography, and talk about the times when using them is extremely helpful.

Camera Support: A Three-Tiered Plan

I like to think of camera support as having three tiers. Tier1: Hand holding. Tier 2: Using a monopod and Tier-3: Using a tripod. The stability of your camera increases as you move through those tiers. With increased camera stability you are able to use a decreasingly lower shutter speed and still maintain a sharp image of a static subject. If you can use a lower shutter speed, this also allows you to decrease your ISO whilst still maintaining the same overall exposure.

In the vast majority of wildlife photography situations, you’ll be shooting with a wide-open aperture, or close to it, so the shutter speed and ISO are going to be the two settings of the exposure triangle that you spend the most time juggling. You want to keep your ISO as low as possible in order to minimize the noise in the image and maximize the dynamic range of the file, but you don’t want to lower it so much that it makes it impossible to get a sharp shot.

Such beautiful creatures to see up close(ish).

Progressing through the three-tier support system allows you to work at those lower shutter speed. Of course the one variable we can’t control is the movement of the wildlife. If the wildlife is moving, a slower shutter speed can result in blurry photos of the animals whether you are using some support or not. In this case, all you can do is wait for those moments of stillness, and snap your photos at those precise points. Using these techniques I have shot many images in near darkness at 600mm and a shutter speed of anything down to 1/80 of a second. In these edge cases, you simply have to take control of whatever you can, and one of those things is using the correct support.

Now you might be thinking: “Why don’t I just go straight for the tripod then? Why even bother with a monopod?”

That is what we are going to talk about next. Despite being a little less stable than a tripod, there are some situations where a monopod excels and allows you to get photos that you might otherwise have missed with a tripod.

#1 – Photographing Wildlife on the Roadside

This porcupine was close to the road when I photographed it on the same day that I photographed to moose in the lead image.

I often travel through areas that have dense wildlife populations, and I’m sure that other wildlife photographers are drawn to similar areas such as the Canadian Rockies, Yellowstone, Grand Tetons or Denali National Park. When I drive through these kinds of places I always keep a telephoto lens attached to my camera on the seat next to me, with a monopod tucked alongside it.

If I suddenly see something interesting, and it’s safe to do so, of course, I’m going to pull over and try to get a shot. Depending on the species, and proximity of the animal, I might get out of the car to get a better angle. If I do get out of the car (ie. it’s not a grizzly bear), then I grab my monopod.

The main reason I reach for a monopod here is speed. It’s much faster to get set up on a fully extended monopod than it is to try and set up and level a tripod. In these situations, it’s never clear how long you will have to get a shot. It might be just a couple of minutes, but it might be just a couple of seconds. Using a monopod allows me to get something in the bag quickly, and also rapidly adjust my own positioning if the animal moves when it sees me.

Not only is setup speed of a monopod faster, but so is the speed of height adjustment. I’m always adjusting the height of my camera above the ground, seeking different perspectives and watching how the background shifts behind the animal as I move up or down. Adjusting the height of a monopod is considerably quicker than trying to do it on a tripod where you’d need so individually adjust each leg.

If I get the shots in the bag with my monopod and deem there to be a benefit to using a tripod then I certainly might grab a tripod from the car afterwards if the animal in question is being particularly accommodating. But more often than not, these roadside encounters are brief, and the monopod gives me the best support in the shortest period of time.

#2 – Stalking Skittish Wildlife in Dense Brush

This scenario was exactly what I faced when photographing the moose, and it’s what lead me to create this tutorial. In the Yukon, moose are hunted for a lot of the year and it means they are extremely skittish around humans. It’s very difficult to get close to them for photography. Of course, that’s the case for a lot of wildlife, so this is not a moose-specific tip.

Having come across this beautiful moose in dense brush, I first grabbed some shots from a distance to get something in the bag. I was pleased to have my monopod with me because this allowed me to use an extremely long 840mm focal length (Sony 200-600mm + 1.4x extender) in relatively low light, and it allowed me to get set up very quickly. At this point, I was prepared for the moose to run off into the woods almost immediately because this is what usually happens. But this time, perhaps because I’m now using a Sony mirrorless camera which is totally silent, it didn’t bolt right away.

Side note: My camera gear was also covered in LensCoat camouflage cover, my clothing was neutral green/olive and my own bright parts – face and hands – were also covered in camo clothing. All of this helped.

Having got a few good long-range shots, I then wanted to creep closer. I did this very slowly, placing each foot purposefully between branches, trying not to make a sound. Every 5ft that I gained on the moose, I would stop and take a new shot with a slightly different perspective, never quite sure when it would be my last opportunity, always expecting it to bolt any second.

This is where the monopod was absolutely key, and I’m sure I would not have got such a range of shots with a tripod. There is no way that I could have set up my tripod quietly every few feet, trying to place legs quietly on the ground between a mass of interlocking branches. Not a chance! But with the monopod, I was easily able to place that single foot quietly on the ground in soft leaves or moss every time, and I never needed to mess around leveling out legs as you would do with a tripod. The monopod is a much faster and stealthier support when moving quietly through the brush.

#3 – Covering Long Distances by Foot

While some may wish wildlife to always be visible from the roadside as in the first scenario, it’s simply not the case. Lots of wildlife can be found with good knowledge and moderate walking, but there are always times when you just have to put the work in and cover great distances.

With a huge pack full of heavy cameras and lenses, it can be tempting to leave the tripod at home and tell yourself that you can handhold your lens for short periods in some light levels. But what if mother nature hands you the perfect opportunity, and you find yourself face to face with your subject in low light, or for an extended period of time?

As you know from the three-tier support system, the monopod is the answer. A solid top-of-the-range carbon monopod like the RRS MC-34 weights 1.5lbs, compared to their equivalent tripod which weighs 3.7lbs. Then factor in the weight of the tripod head and the difference becomes even more exaggerated. And no, a monopod is not a solution that you can use for things like long exposure landscape photography where zero camera movement is needed, but for wildlife photography, the minimum useable shutter speed between a monopod and a tripod is not that different because you always have to have enough shutter speed to factor in the small movements of the wildlife.

#4 – Covering Long Distances by Air

As baggage weight restrictions constrict further and further every year while airlines offset costs by filling their holds with cargo, photographers are left trying to decide what to leave at home on their big trips abroad. I covered the huge difference in weight between a monopod and a tripod in #3, but let’s finish it up by assuming that you want to use a gimbal head on your tripod. My preferred choice is the ProMediaGear Katana Jr (read the Katana Junior review here), and even though that is about the lightest on the market, it’s still 2.4lbs. Stick that on a 3.7lb tripod and you’re at 6.1lbs, compared to the 1.1-1.5lbs of a really good carbon monopod.

Knocking 5+lbs off your packed weight might be important, but also stop to think about it this way: Can you leave the tripod and bring another lens and a backup camera body in its place? Would that be more useful than the tripod, if the monopod is all the support you need?

Another thing to consider is that you can bring a monopod on a plane as carry-on, far more easily than you can a tripod. While the TSA says you can bring a monopod or a tripod, it’s the weight and bulk that is much more likely to be the issue. A tripod of a necessary size, usually has a much monger folded length than a monopod of the necessary size and capacity. To stick with the RRS example I was using, their 3-series monopod is 21.6 inches when collapsed. But the 3-series tripod is 25.4 inches long when collapsed. That definitely takes the tripod out of the running for carry-on, if that’s a consideration for you.

Interesting Gorilla Photography Monopod Trivia

If you’re planning a trip to photograph mountain gorillas in Rwanda, Uganda or the Congo, you might think that a monopod sounds perfect based on the examples I have shared in this post. The trek to the gorillas can be long and difficult, and when you reach them you might be following them through extremely dense jungle.

Unfortunately, using a monopod or a tripod while photographing gorillas is definitely not a good idea, and your guides will probably tell you this. Some of the gorillas may interpret them as spears and let’s just say they might have some bad memories…

Perhaps there are some places where the option will be available to you based on your guide’s knowledge or specific animals, but I would certainly not rely on this. Speak to your guides about this before you go on the trip, and be prepared to simply use a lens that has image stabilization, and is of a weight you can comfortably hand-hold for long periods. A 70-200 f/2.8 is the go-to option, paired with a 24-70 f/2.8 and maybe a 300mm f/2.8 for those that want some tighter portraits.

Best Monopod Head

While we are on the subject of monopods, I also want to flag what I believe to be the best monopod head on the market: The Wimberley MH-100 Monogimbal. Basically, this is a tiny gimbal for your monopod, and it makes it much easier to shoot up, shoot down or track fast-moving wildlife when using a monopod. Since buying one of these, it has never left my camera bag! Unlike the typical 2-way tilt head design of all other monopod heads, this mini gimbal head allows you to balance your camera so that you can remove a hand from it without having to tighten the rotation knob. It’s brilliant!

–>> You can check out my full review here: Wimberley MH-100 Monogimbal Review

You may like