I’ve written extensively in the past about screw-on and rectangular filters for camera lenses, but Canon’s super telephoto lenses have a front element that is simply too large to be used effectively with either of those two filter types. Instead, theses lenses feature a drop-in filter slot that sits behind the rearmost glass element. These are not to be confused with the gelatin filter slots found on the Canon 8-15 f/4 L fisheye, the Canon 11-24mm f/4 L, Canon 17-40 f/4 L and the Canon 14mm f/2.8 L II. Gelatin slots on those wide-angle lenses use pre-cut gelatin sheets that are extremely thin, whereas the drop-in filters for the super telephoto lenses use proper glasses filters.
The term “super telephoto” doesn’t have a specific focal length definition, so for clarity, these are the current Canon lenses that have a drop-in slot:
Canon EF Mount
To my knowledge, all previous iterations of these same lenses also had drop-in slots on them. Smaller Canon telephoto lenses such as the Canon 300mm f/4 L IS, the Canon 400mm f/5.6 L, and the Canon 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS II have a 77mm front thread on them which makes them easily compatible with standard screw-on filters.
Canon Drop-In Filter Types
There are three types of Canon drop-in filter.
Canon Drop-In Filter with gelatin holder
Until the launch of the Mark III super telephoto lenses, every Canon lens with a drop-in slot came with this pre-installed. Simply pinch the two filter buttons towards the centre of the lens and pull upwards to release it.
It is fitted with a clear piece of plastic that serves as a first line of defence against large dirt and dust particles entering the rear of the lens when there is no rear cap fitted. When you remove this filter, it’s a good idea to do it very gently so that you any dirt that has collected on it doesn’t get dumped into the lens elements!
Whilst I have personally never seen or heard of anyone actually doing it, you could use gelatin filters in this holder. Wratten filters can be purchased in larger sheets of various densities, and then cut down to the correct size. Generally speaking, these kinds of filters impart much more of a colour cast than a glass ND filter, and they can have more of an effect of image sharpness as well. For this reason, most don’t bother, and simply go on to use the 52mm drop-in adapter.
For this reason, starting with the Canon 400mm f/2.8 L IS III and 600mm f/4 L IS III, Canon stopped including the 52mm gelatin holder with the lenses, and instead began including the drop-in 52mm adapter which we will talk about next.
Canon Drop-In 52mm Adapter
This drop-in filter initially comes fitted with a clear glass 52mm filter. The clear filter can be unscrewed and then you can fit other kinds of 52mm filter in its place. The most commonly used filter is an ND filter, although anything that’s available with a 52mm thread size would work, if the diameter of the filter housing is small enough – see below note!
IMPORTANT: 52mm Filter Sizing
Unfortunately Canon haven’t made things that easy when it comes to finding compatible 52mm filters for these holders. I have been unable to get specific official size requirements from Canon, despite multiple attempts with various technical people, so some of this is a bit of guess work and my own measurements. Chime in using the comments if you have info to share!
There are two dimensions that are important to finding a compatible 52mm filter, other than the 52mm thread sizing of course!
- The height of the filter (not including the height of the thread)
- The diameter of the filter
Most people think of the diameter of the filter as being the quoted filter size, i.e. 52mm in this case, but this refers to the thread diameter. The actual filter diameter is a little wider than that. If it’s too wide, it’ll fit in to the filter holder, but you won’t be able to get the holder back into the lens. This will be the most common issue when trying to find a compatible filter.
The biggest clue we have as to the maximum size of filter that actually works, is the protective glass filter that comes with the 52mm filter holder in the first place. Obviously if you can find a filter that is the same width as that Canon one, or smaller, then it will fit. By my measurement the included Canon protective glass filter is 54mm wide.
To be safe, you need to find a filter that is 54mm wide or less. Unfortunately, this isn’t always a measurement that is available in filter specifications as most people simply quote the filter diameter.
In terms of filter height, this shouldn’t be much of a problem. The Canon clear glass protective filter appears to be about 5mm in thickness above the thread, and it’s easy to find filters that come below that measurement. From careful inspection, I actually think a filter that is up to about 7mm in thickness should work, but as I said above, it’s the diameter that’s going to prove more challenging.
Filters that are known NOT to work (without modification):
- I really love the Breakthrough Photography filters as they are extremely colour neutral. Unfortunately one of their other features is a brass knurling around the filter to help grip them tightly to get them on and off the lens. This knurling is quite chunky and it means you cannot use the Breakthrough Photography ND filters in the Canon 52mm Drop-In Adapter.
- I have also tested the B&W Slim 103M series ND filters and these are also too wide to fit into the lens.
- I have also tested the Formatt-Hitech 52mm Superslim ND 0.9 – It is much closer to fitting than the others that I have tried, but alas, this is also too wide. If you want to go down the route of filing the edges of the filter to make it fit, this one would take the least amount of filing. I would estimate that it is perhaps less than 1mm too wide to fit.
- Benro SHD IR-cut ULCA WMC ND8 filter (SKU: SHDND852) was tested by reader Kai Harrekilde (thanks!) and confirmed not to fit.
Filters that are known to work:
- A comment at the bottom of this post from Victor Abyad confirms that the B&W F-Pro ND Filters work. I have not yet confirmed myself but Victor was kind enough to send photos of the filters installed in his filter holder for confirmation. Unfortunately, these filters seem to have been discontinued, though you may have some luck finding them in local photo stores. I believe they have been replaced by the filter mentioned below.
- B+W Filter MASTER 803 ND Pro 0.9 +3′ MRC nano – This filter is confirmed to fit by Kai Harrekilde, and is currently available though major online retailers like B&H Photo. This is the current best option for Canon drop-in-filters.
More Reader Notes from Kai Harrekilde:
I just received a screw drop-in filter holder, and took my calipers to it judge if I could make the Benro filter fit like (commentor) ‘Basis’ mentioned.
The diameter of the screw-in holder is 53.8mm, and the inside diameter of my EF 300mm f/2.8L II USM is 54.05mm – so your advice about the 54mm is spot on. The ring on the filter I got (Benro SHD IR-cut ULCA WMC ND8) is 55mm in diameter. I’ll be returning it shortly, and have ordered the B+W ND0.9 MRC Nano Master today (this appears to be the successor of the B+W F-Pro ND filter mentioned by Victor Abyad in the comment section).
I noticed ‘Basis’ commenting (here) that filing down 3 bumps on each side, which was enough to make an ND filter from ‘Breakthrough’ fit. This will be a bit touch-and-go for some filters, as the slot is circular inside the lens. I measured the depth from the upper side to the bottom, and with the Benro filter (27.5mm diameter) it’s around 0.5mm too tall to fit (all the way around the edge). Admittedly, I did not take a file to the filter even though it’s a fairly inexpensive one, to test this.
PS: It seems that the screw-in filter adapter has gone into backorder at least all over Europe (where I am). This makes me suspect that Canon will be phasing out all drop-in filters going forward (read: RF lenses). As the RF 400/800 and RF 600/1200 lenses are really EF lenses with welded-on RF adapters and 2x TC’s, keeping the drop-in filter slot made sense. But the newly released RF 100-300 and the rumors of the RF 200-500 does not have the drop-in slot. (well spotted, Kai!)
PPS: I’m using the 3-stop ND filter for motorcycle racing photography when shooting under full daylight as I want to keep the shutter down to around 1/160sec (to get sense of speed in the wheel and surroundings) and a fairly low aperture (e.g. f/5.6-f/8) with an ISO 100.
Best regards from Denmark,
Update: I received the ‘B+W Filter MASTER 803 ND Pro 0.9 +3′ MRC nano’ (yes, it says all that on the package) and it *fits*. 53.96mm diameter and 5.77mm thickness (including the thread).
Do you have a 52mm filter that actually fits into the holder and into the lens?
Please leave a comment below so that other people can be helped in this quest! Unfortunately the model of filter that I first found to fit, is no longer being manufactured so I’m trying to source a new filter that I can recommend to people for this purpose.
Why use an ND filter in such a long telephoto lens?
With wide-angle lenses, ND filters are typically used to blur the motion of water or clouds in landscape images, and sometimes to enable you to use a very wide aperture in the mid day sun for portraiture. You might consider using an ND filter in a super telephoto lens for one of these reasons too, especially for portraiture with the 200mm f/2, but there are other reasons that are maybe more likely with such long focal lengths. Sometimes you might want to capture a slow shutter speed for a panning shot whilst photographing sports, and this would typically mean stopping the lens down to f/32 to get the slowest shutter, perhaps something like 1/30 of a second for panning with a fast car. Lenses suffer from diffraction at smaller apertures though, so they are sharper when used at something closer to f/8. By using an ND filter, such as a 6-stop ND in the 53mm drop=in holder, you can achieve the same slow shutter, but at a wider aperture. If you nail your panning motion for a perfectly sharp subject, you’ll be using the lens at its peak point of performance. Now, I’ll admit this this is only a small improvement, and it’s very hard to do with such slow pans anyway, but it is potentially a reason why you might want to shoot at a wider aperture with the ND.
The second reason you might want to do that is to prevent a multitude of dust spots from appearing on your image. As you stop the lens down towards f/32, every little tiny spec of dust will suddenly become visible in your image. If you’re shooting sports or events for a wire service, where time is of the essence, you don’t want to have to try and clean a ton of tiny specs from your image during the edit! Seriously, this can make a MASSIVE difference to your workflow if you’re trying out some slow shutter pans at an event. Camera’s have gotten a lot better at self-cleaning their sensors, but at f/32, no matter how much care you take of your equipment, you’re going to have little black spots all over your image. With a wider aperture, caused by using the ND filter, these won’t be visible.
The third reason you might use ND filters on your long lens if for shooting video. When shooting video, the optimal shutter speed is usually that which is twice the frame rate you are shooting in – sometimes called 180 degree shutter angle. This produces video that looks smooth and filmic, instead of being too jittery and “digital” looking. If you’re shooting video at 30fps, this means a 1/60 second shutter speed, but that’s quite slow for a bright sunny day and it would be hard to achieve unless you cut some light out by using an ND filter. For filmmakers, an ND filter allows them to maintain a nice wide aperture, but also get down to these slow shutter speeds.
I doubt it’s worth carrying around a lot of different densities of 52mm ND filters, I find that a single 6-stop ND filter is pretty much perfect for me for this kind of usage. I leave it in the filter holder and that means it’s ready at a moment’s notice. The filter thread on the 52mm drop-in holder is plastic, fiddly and easy to cross thread, so that’s another good reason to just pick one density of ND filter and install it forever. If I was constantly screwing different filter densities in and out, I’d definitely be worried about the thread’s longevity.
I like to use the Formatt-Hitech Firecrest 6-stop ND filters because they are extremely colour neutral, and a very reasonable price. You can use the coupon code ShutterMuse10 to get a 10% discount on all Formatt-Hitech filters purchased from either their US or international store.
Canon Drop-In Circular Polarizer
Circular polarizing filters are useful for cutting down reflections from water and foliage. The Canon drop-in polarizer has a small protruding wheel on it so that you can adjust the polarization effect when the filter is in place within the lens. In terms of super telephoto lens subjects, it would be unusual to try and use a circular polarizer for sports photography because the 2-stop light loss caused by the filter is often a problem in terms of getting a fast enough shutter speed. A polarizing filter can be very useful in wildlife photography though, especially when you subject has shiny skin/fur, or is often wet and living around water – an alligator, for example. At the extremities of the day when light is low, you do have to be wary of the light loss but when used correctly it can make a huge difference to your image, and is an effect that can’t be replicated in post processing software. I often find it to be useful when you’re forced into photographing wildlife in less-then-optimal lighting conditions with the sun high in the sky.
Personally I’m a huge fan of mountain landscapes shot with a long focal length, I just can’t get enough of the compression effect and wonderful layers you can create. A polarizing filter can really help to cut down on haze in these kinds of shots, and it also removes the shine from wet rocks, and boost the blues in the sky. I love using mine with my 400mm f/4 DO IS II!
Mark I vs Mark II vs Mark III Drop-In Filters
When I was doing my own initial research to buy my drop-in filters I discovered that some are labelled with a Mark “I” designation, and some have a “II”. Later, along with the introduction of the new Mark III super telephoto lenses, Canon also quietly launched Mark III drop-in filters.
The only difference between the three types is the colour of the paint. When Canon introduced the the first of the Mark II IS super telephoto lenses (the 300mm f/2.8 L IS II and 400mm f/2.8 L IS II) they subtly changed the famous off-white colour of the lenses to be even more white, and less beige. The Mark II drop-in filters match the colour on all the newer lenses from that point onwards. For the Mark III super telephoto lenses there was another subtle colour shift in the lens paint, so we get new drop-in filters again.
As I said, there’s no functional difference, though, so if you can find a bargain on an older Mark I version or Mark II and don’t mind that it’s s slightly different colour to your lens, you can still use it. Below is the current super telephoto lenses matched to their correctly coloured filters.
W(II) Filters (Find at B&H)
W(III) Filters (Find at B&H)
Canon Drop-In Filter Case Options
The Canon drop-in filters ship in a circular, plastic protective case. It offers considerable protection, but it’s incredibly bulky and you certainly won’t want to carry them around if you have more than one drop-in filter. To my knowledge, nobody is making a dedicated third-party carrying case for Canon drop-in filters, but the MindShift Gear Filter Nest Mini ($24.99) is is a near perfect solution. The Filter Nest Mini has slots for four regular filters, but it will comfortably hold three drop-in filters, as well as one additional 52mm ND filter that you may wish to carry for your 52mm drop-in filter adapter. I’d guess that for most people, only two of the slots will get used: One for a drop-in polarizer and one for the drop-in 52mm adapter, and of course you can store the standard drop-in clear filter holder in there whilst one of the other two specialized filters is being used.
The Filter Nest Mini is well padded, and the grab-handle is useful for clipping to some kind of tether in your bag so that you never leave your expensive filters behind when bags are being packed in a hurry. Perhaps I’m paranoid, but I always try and attach these kinds of small filter bags to my main bag in some fashion.
Note: MindShift Gear are good friends of mine, and if you spend more than $50 on their online store after clicking through one of my links, like this one, you’ll be able to select a free gift at the checkout point, such as the excellent House of Cards memory card wallet. I know the Filter Nest Mini doesn’t tip you over that $50 point, so perhaps consider adding a Filter Hive Mini to your order for your square filters, or even the full-sized Filter Hive.
The thing that makes the Filter Nest Mini the perfect option for this purpose, is the generous, and elasticated width of the filter slots in the case. There are lots of other filter cases out there with a similar form factor, but they generally won’t accept such thick filters in each slot.
Drop-In Filters for Other Brands
In case you were wondering, Canon aren’t alone in offering these kinds of filters for super telephoto lenses. Nikon also make a drop-in circular polarizer, much like the Canon one, but their lenses actually come with their version of the 52mm drop-in filter pre installed (Canon started doing this from the Mark III lenses onwards), and if you want the Nikon gelatin holder then that is an additional (and tough to find) purchase. You’ll also find a drop-in circular polarizer for the Sigma and Sony super telephoto lenses (it exists, but it’s hard to find).
There are no third-party drop-in filters for Canon lenses, so you’ll have to buy Canon’s ones if you want them.
Which Ones Should you Buy?
If you’re a wildlife photographer then I think the drop-in polarizer is a worthwhile investment. It’s not cheap, but it’s not hugely more expensive than most normal polarizers, and you are putting it in a lens that costs many thousands of dollars. I’ll admit that I don’t use mine that often, but when I do use it I’m always grateful to have it because, like I said before, there’s really no way to simulate its effects in post processing. A polarizer can completely transform the look of a subject such as a fur-covered mammal that has been out in the rain, or it can remove distracting water reflections around water fowl. If you are working in good light, it’s a great addition to your toolbox.
Where to Buy + a Warning!
These are a pretty niche item so not everyone has a good stock of them. I’ve also seen them mislabelled on many online stores, and even Canon’s own website actually uses the wrong image for one of them on its product page, which I think might be the source of much of the online confusion. They are very similar looking!! People seem to get particularly confused between the 52mm threaded holder and the gelatin holder. Here are the correct B&H links: