When Is a Photo Backup Not a Photo Backup?

Updated in May 2018 with additional information and edits to add more clarity.

As I continue to generate more and more data with my photography business I’m always expanding my storage solutions and trying to stay on top of the latest technologies that can help me improve my workflow.  Whilst reading some reviews of several NAS (network attached storage) devices on a popular online store,  something became abundantly clear to me: Many people don’t understand the term “backup”.

This misunderstanding could be a huge problem, and just reading a small sampling of customer reviews on generally well regarded storage products shows me that it has caused many people to lose a lot of their data. Imagine if you were to lose all your photos! You’d be devastated, and it could be financially crippling if photography is part of your business.

RAID is Not a Backup

A RAID hard drive system that’s configured as RAID 1 means that all data is duplicated onto a second drive.  Many people mistake this as being a safe backup solution and think that because they now have two copies of their photos, everything is safe. Many Drobo owners also think the same thing with Drobo’s own Beyond Raid technology.


RAID 1 devices protect you from drive failure, so if one of the drives fails physically in a catastrophic manner, your data will be accessible on the other drive.  This is great, because drive failures are an unfortunate certainty at some point, but it’s not the end of the story.  Mechanical drive failure isn’t the only way that you can lose your files!

Sometimes file systems get corrupted and it renders the data un-readable.  It doesn’t happen often, but it does  happen.  With a RAID 1, since the drives are mirrored, this corrupted file system gets duplicated as well and all your photos can be lost in the blink of an eye if you are only relying on RAID 1 mirror as your “backup”.

The other common way to lose an image is through simple human error.  We’ve all accidentally deleted the wrong file at some time in our lives and whilst things are sometimes available in the trash can, this isn’t always the case if you have accidentally performed a secure erase, or emptied the trash.  The trash can also work differently with externally attached drives as well so it’s not a total safety net.  With a RAID 1 drive, if you accidentally delete a photo (or folder of photos) from one drive, it immediately gets deleted from the other drive as well.

Can’t really call that a backup now, can you?

When you connect a RAID 1 device to your computer, the two drives (or multiples thereof), show up as one single mounted volume.  A good rule of thumb is that your files need to exist on multiple volumes.  Since the RAID  1 drives only show up as one volume, this is not a backup.  If you connect two RAID 1 drives, and use a program like Carbon Copy Cloner to copy files from one to the other, then you will have two volumes and therefore have a useable backup.

“External” Doesn’t Mean Backup

As I mentioned at the top of the post, I was compelled to write this after reading a series of user “reviews”. Here’s is a quote that perfectly underlines a common misunderstanding with file backup, and this guy wasn’t alone in his thinking:


Do not make the same mistake that I did and use this drive for backing up anything that you don’t have an alternative backup for. – review from online store.

In this case the gentleman responsible for this quote was referring to a file system failure that had caused him to lose all of his data from an externally connected drive.  Hopefully after reading the first section of this post, you see what the problem is here.  It turns out that the support techs for his failed drive had informed him his files were lost and suggested he restored his files from his other location. Of course we can see that actually he didn’t have another copy of the files anywhere else, so they were all gone.

The key misunderstanding is represented in his phrase “anything that you don’t have an alternative backup for”, as if his first copy of the files on his external drive was a backup.  If he had maintained the files on his computer AND on his externally connected drive, then that would be considered a backup.  The files would be in two places on two volumes and not directly mirrored, but unfortunately it seems that he was under the assumption that putting things on an external drive is in and of itself, a backup.

I’m sure that some people, maybe even many people, are aware this this isn’t the case, but having read similar stories to this guy’s one all morning, I want to make sure that everyone gets on the same page.  Yes, backups are almost always on externally connected drives, but not all externally connected drives are backups. Simply having the files on an external drive doesn’t make it a backup unless you also have those files in another location.

In fact it’s best to have them in more than one other location but you can read more about that here in my article about my personal photo backup routine. The same thing goes for RAID devices as well. They are a useful way to maintain continuous access to files in the event of a single drive failure, but they are not a backup on their own, simply hardware redundancy.  A backup is copy of your file that is located in a different place.  It could simply be on a different drive volume, or it could be a different physical place (using a NAS or cloud storage).

Simultaneous Drive Failures

Another reason that RAID doesn’t necessarily mean that your photos are backed up, is because many common RAID configurations (RAID 1, RAID 5) are only able to protect you from a single drive failure. If two drives fail at the same time, you will lose all of your data instantly. The reason I’m specifically drawing attention to this is because I know a photographer who had this happen. Unfortunately she had two simultaneous drive failures in her device, and a career’s worth of photos was gone in a flash. Devastating.

Simultaneous drive failure might sound unlikely, but it’s actually more common than you might think. Hard drives have a lifespan and most people buy all the drives for their RAID device at the same time. It therefore stands to reason that if one drive fails due to regular wear and tear, the others can’t be far off. A quick Google search will bring up many accounts of this kind of double failure.

The danger can be somewhat mitigated by using RAID configurations that can handle multiple failures, such as RAID6, or by using dual disk redundancy mode if you have a Drobo.  However, the best solution is simply to have all of your images on a second onsite device, and also a third offsite device. This is exactly the approach I take – detailed in these posts.

I hope that this article, along with the many other backup related posts on this site help you to secure your photos for a lifetime. I’m beginning to lose track of the number of horror stories I’ve heard about photographers losing their photos due to improper backup routines. It’s entirely preventable if you follow the best practices that I’ve laid out in my backup routine posts. Please take the time to read it!

Photo of author

Dan Carr

Professional photographer based in Yukon, Canada, and founder of Shutter Muse. His editorial work has been featured in publications all over the world, and his commercial clients include brands such as Nike, Apple, Adobe and Red Bull.

You may like

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published or shared. Please note that if you include a link in your comment, it will have to be moderated first before it appears on the site. Required fields are marked*

By submitting a comment this form also collects your name, email and IP address so that we can prevent spam. For more info check our privacy policy.